.
Lemma
If
, then
-cycle of
,
odd, contributes to
exactly
cyclic factors, each of which is an
-cycle.
-cycle of
,
even,
contributes to
exactly one
cycle of length
and
further cycles, which are of length
.
, say
an
-cycle and a
-cycle,
contributes to
exactly
cyclic factors, each of which
has the length
.
arise in this way.
Proof:
i) First let be odd. Without loss of generality we may
assume that the
-cycle in question is
. Consider a positive
. Then
contains the following cyclic permutation of
-subsets:
This cycle is of length , and the cycles of this form arising from
different
are pairwise disjoint. Furthermore these are all
the cycles arising from
since, for each such
, we have,
as
is odd:
ii) If is even, say
, we
may assume that the cyclic factor of
is
. It yields, for
, the
different
-cycles
together with the -cycle
iii) A pair of cyclic factors of , say
the pair
contributes to
the following product of disjoint cycles:
The length of each of these cyclic factors is , and their number
is therefore equal to
.
iv) is clear.
This lemma yields the cycle structure
of and the desired
number
of cyclic factors which we need in order to evaluate
the number of graphs on
vertices by an application of the Cauchy-Frobenius
Lemma:
.
Corollary
For each
on
we have:
is odd, then
is even, then
In the next two programs you can enter a permutation and compute the
cycle type
and the
total number of cyclic factors
of the induced permutation on -subsets.